🌳 Superus

As We May Think”

From Douglas Engelbart and the Mother of all Demos | Hidden Heroes

25 years later, Engelbart would introduce the very first machine to live up to Bush’s original vision of the Memex. 

From Douglas Engelbart and the Mother of all Demos | Hidden Heroes

The US Copyright Office has issued guidance regarding works that contain material generated by artificial intelligence (AI). The guidance states that if a work's traditional elements of authorship were produced by a machine, the work lacks human authorship and will not be registered. This means that AI-generated material is not protected by copyright and must be disclaimed in a registration application. However, there is still uncertainty around the issue, particularly around the level of creative control exercised by users over AI-generated content.

The guidance from the US Copyright Office has raised questions about the extent to which AI-generated content can be considered original works. There is a blurry line when it comes to AI-generated art, for example, as users may combine AI-generated content with human modifications or curation. It is unclear whether these works will be protected by copyright, particularly if the traditional elements of authorship were generated by AI. Additionally, large organizations are unlikely to want to risk losing copyright protection for their materials, which may impact the use of AI assistants by programmers.

The guidance from the US Copyright Office is likely to be litigated and potentially altered in the coming months/years. There is uncertainty around the issue of AI-generated works and copyright, particularly as AI technology evolves and becomes more sophisticated. It remains to be seen how the issue will be resolved and what impact it will have on the creation and use of AI-generated content. Nonetheless, this guidance suggests that any works generated solely by AI, without significant human input or modification, will not be copyrightable.

The US Copyright Office has recently issued guidance on how to register works containing material generated by artificial intelligence (AI).

According to the guidance, if traditional elements of authorship in a work were produced by a machine, then the resulting work is not considered to have human authorship. This means that AI-generated material is not eligible for copyright protection and must be disclaimed in a registration application.

Although the guidance provides some clarity around the issue of AI-generated material and copyright, there is still uncertainty surrounding the level of creative control exercised by users over such content. It's unclear how this would be established, and whether there's a threshold level of human involvement required to determine authorship.

Despite these uncertainties, the guidance from the US Copyright Office is an important step forward in addressing the legal questions surrounding AI-generated material. As AI continues to evolve and play an increasingly important role in content creation, it is likely that further guidance will be needed to establish clear rules and create a level playing field for creators and users alike.

The US Copyright Office has provided guidance stating that any works generated solely by AI, without significant human input or modification, will not be copyrightable. However, as AI technology evolves, the issue of copyright for AI-generated works is likely to be litigated and potentially altered in the future. There is uncertainty around this issue, and its impact on the creation and use of AI-generated content remains to be seen.

Cool

As We May Think”

From Douglas Engelbart and the Mother of all Demos | Hidden Heroes